0.00/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 960 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 120 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 02:41:05 EDT 2022 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime : 0.17/0.44 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.17/0.44 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 600s (5) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_ho_3 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # post_as_ho1 with pid 21437 completed with status 0 0.17/0.46 # Result found by post_as_ho1 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 600s (5) cores 0.17/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied 0.17/0.46 # Search class: HUUPM-FFSS11-SSSFFFNN 0.17/0.46 # partial match(3): HUUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFMNN 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 325s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 61s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_ho_4 with 55s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 55s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 55s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # post_as_ho5 with pid 21447 completed with status 0 0.17/0.46 # Result found by post_as_ho5 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 600s (5) cores 0.17/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied 0.17/0.46 # Search class: HUUPM-FFSS11-SSSFFFNN 0.17/0.46 # partial match(3): HUUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFMNN 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 325s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 61s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_ho_4 with 55s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 55s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.17/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.17/0.46 0.17/0.46 # Proof found! 0.17/0.46 # SZS status Theorem 0.17/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_22, type, esk1_0: a > a > a). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_23, type, esk2_0: a > a > a). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_24, type, esk3_0: a). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_25, type, esk4_0: a). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_26, type, esk5_1: a > a). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_27, type, esk6_0: a). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_28, type, esk7_0: a). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_29, type, esk8_0: a). 0.17/0.46 thf(cCD_LATTICE_THM_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > a > a, X2:a > a > a, X3:a, X4:a]:((![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((((((X1 @ X5 @ X6)=(X3))&((X2 @ X5 @ X6)=(X4)))&((X2 @ X5 @ X7)=(X4)))&((X1 @ X5 @ X7)=(X3)))=>((X6)=(X7))))<=((((((((((((((![X5:a]:(((X2 @ X5 @ X5)=(X5)))&![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X2 @ (X2 @ X5 @ X6) @ X7)=(X2 @ X5 @ (X2 @ X6 @ X7)))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X2 @ (X1 @ X5 @ X6) @ X6)=(X6))))&![X5:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X5)=(X5))))&![X5:a]:(((X2 @ X4 @ X5)=(X4))))&![X5:a]:(((X1 @ X4 @ X5)=(X5))))&![X5:a]:(?[X6:a]:((((X2 @ X5 @ X6)=(X4))&((X1 @ X5 @ X6)=(X3))))))&![X5:a]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X5)=(X3))))&![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X1 @ X5 @ (X2 @ X6 @ X7))=(X2 @ (X1 @ X5 @ X6) @ (X1 @ X5 @ X7)))))&![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X2 @ X5 @ (X1 @ X6 @ X7))=(X1 @ (X2 @ X5 @ X6) @ (X2 @ X5 @ X7)))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X1 @ (X2 @ X5 @ X6) @ X6)=(X6))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X2 @ X5 @ X6)=(X2 @ X6 @ X5))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X1 @ X5 @ X6)=(X1 @ X6 @ X5))))&![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X1 @ (X1 @ X5 @ X6) @ X7)=(X1 @ X5 @ (X1 @ X6 @ X7)))))&![X5:a]:(((X1 @ X5 @ X5)=(X5)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cCD_LATTICE_THM_pme)). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > a > a, X2:a > a > a, X3:a, X4:a]:((((((((((((((((![X5:a]:(((X2 @ X5 @ X5)=(X5)))&![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X2 @ (X2 @ X5 @ X6) @ X7)=(X2 @ X5 @ (X2 @ X6 @ X7)))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X2 @ (X1 @ X5 @ X6) @ X6)=(X6))))&![X5:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X5)=(X5))))&![X5:a]:(((X2 @ X4 @ X5)=(X4))))&![X5:a]:(((X1 @ X4 @ X5)=(X5))))&![X5:a]:(?[X6:a]:((((X2 @ X5 @ X6)=(X4))&((X1 @ X5 @ X6)=(X3))))))&![X5:a]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X5)=(X3))))&![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X1 @ X5 @ (X2 @ X6 @ X7))=(X2 @ (X1 @ X5 @ X6) @ (X1 @ X5 @ X7)))))&![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X2 @ X5 @ (X1 @ X6 @ X7))=(X1 @ (X2 @ X5 @ X6) @ (X2 @ X5 @ X7)))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X1 @ (X2 @ X5 @ X6) @ X6)=(X6))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X2 @ X5 @ X6)=(X2 @ X6 @ X5))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X1 @ X5 @ X6)=(X1 @ X6 @ X5))))&![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X1 @ (X1 @ X5 @ X6) @ X7)=(X1 @ X5 @ (X1 @ X6 @ X7)))))&![X5:a]:(((X1 @ X5 @ X5)=(X5))))=>![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((((((X1 @ X5 @ X6)=(X3))&((X2 @ X5 @ X6)=(X4)))&((X2 @ X5 @ X7)=(X4)))&((X1 @ X5 @ X7)=(X3)))=>((X6)=(X7))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cCD_LATTICE_THM_pme])])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X47:a, X48:a, X49:a, X50:a, X51:a, X52:a, X53:a, X54:a, X55:a, X56:a, X58:a, X59:a, X60:a, X61:a, X62:a, X63:a, X64:a, X65:a, X66:a, X67:a, X68:a, X69:a, X70:a, X71:a, X72:a, X73:a, X74:a]:((((((((((((((((((esk2_0 @ X47 @ X47)=(X47))&((esk2_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X48 @ X49) @ X50)=(esk2_0 @ X48 @ (esk2_0 @ X49 @ X50))))&((esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X51 @ X52) @ X52)=(X52)))&((esk2_0 @ esk3_0 @ X53)=(X53)))&((esk2_0 @ esk4_0 @ X54)=(esk4_0)))&((esk1_0 @ esk4_0 @ X55)=(X55)))&(((esk2_0 @ X56 @ (esk5_1 @ X56))=(esk4_0))&((esk1_0 @ X56 @ (esk5_1 @ X56))=(esk3_0))))&((esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ X58)=(esk3_0)))&((esk1_0 @ X59 @ (esk2_0 @ X60 @ X61))=(esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X59 @ X60) @ (esk1_0 @ X59 @ X61))))&((esk2_0 @ X62 @ (esk1_0 @ X63 @ X64))=(esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X62 @ X63) @ (esk2_0 @ X62 @ X64))))&((esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X65 @ X66) @ X66)=(X66)))&((esk2_0 @ X67 @ X68)=(esk2_0 @ X68 @ X67)))&((esk1_0 @ X69 @ X70)=(esk1_0 @ X70 @ X69)))&((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X71 @ X72) @ X73)=(esk1_0 @ X71 @ (esk1_0 @ X72 @ X73))))&((esk1_0 @ X74 @ X74)=(X74)))&((((((esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0)=(esk3_0))&((esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0)=(esk4_0)))&((esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0)=(esk4_0)))&((esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0)=(esk3_0)))&((esk7_0)!=(esk8_0))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0)=(esk4_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4)=(esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk1_0 @ esk4_0 @ X3)=(X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4)=(esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0)=(esk4_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ X5))=(esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_0 @ esk8_0 @ esk6_0)=(esk4_0)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ esk4_0)=(X3))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0)=(esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ esk3_0 @ X3)=(X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_0 @ esk7_0 @ esk6_0)=(esk4_0)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_4])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0)=(esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ esk8_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ esk6_0))=(esk2_0 @ esk8_0 @ X3))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_10])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ esk6_0)=(esk3_0)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_6])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ esk3_0)=(X3))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_4])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ esk6_0))=(esk2_0 @ esk7_0 @ X3))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_13]), c_0_10])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ esk6_0)=(esk3_0)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_6])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_0 @ esk7_0 @ esk8_0)=(esk8_0)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_17]), c_0_4])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ((esk7_0)!=(esk8_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19]), c_0_17]), c_0_20]), c_0_21]), ['proof']). 0.17/0.46 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.17/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 2 0.17/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses : 22 0.17/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21 0.17/0.46 # Processed clauses : 127 0.17/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 29 0.17/0.46 # ...subsumed : 8 0.17/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 90 0.17/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.17/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.17/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.17/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 9 0.17/0.46 # Generated clauses : 928 0.17/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 482 0.17/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.17/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.17/0.46 # Paramodulations : 928 0.17/0.46 # Factorizations : 0 0.17/0.46 # NegExts : 0 0.17/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 60 0.17/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 55 0.17/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4 0.17/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.17/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 393 0.17/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 393 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 30 0.17/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 0.17/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.17/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5 0.17/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 128 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 99 0.17/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.17/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0 0.17/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13722 0.17/0.46 0.17/0.46 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.014 s 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.003 s 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.017 s 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1884 pages 0.17/0.46 0.17/0.46 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.064 s 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.013 s 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.078 s 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages 0.17/0.46 EOF